Where Han technology focused on the individual, Rome technology focused on the state. You need the treatment because, its a matter of life and death and your family needs you because they depend on you.
These inventions have in one way or another shaped the way our world is lived in right now. Han was praiseful towards its achievements and progression of the technology, while few Roman high officials depicted that the utilizing technology is favorable.
How to Write a Summary of an Article? In previous times, the tools manufactured by workers for their own use were of excellent quality.
However, the reason why state involvement worked for Rome and not Han China is because of incentive. Instead, it pays a fixed daily amount if a covered occurrence renders one unable to work, hospitalized, or some other risk specified in the policy.
An iron chicken sickle and an iron dagger from the Han period A suit of bronze scale mail armor from the Han dynasty Furnaces and smelting techniques[ edit ] A blast furnace converts raw iron ore into pig ironwhich can be remelted in a cupola furnace to produce cast iron.
Although Han insisted the praiseful Technological attitudes in han china and, there were still some imperfect aspects of the technology while Roman regarded the tool manufacturing is a vulgar profession of the career, both are the negative point toward the technology.
An additional document I feel would be beneficial in helping to convey my thesis would be a journal entry from the point of view of a Han Peasant, depicting their attitude towards the new advancements in technology. The bulk of attitude towards engineering during the Han dynasty and Roman Empire reasonably was positive.
Agriculturists and craftsman were one of the largest classes in the Han Empire. Not only has his invention been widely used, but it has also been adopted and innovated by those who use it. Huan Tan, a Han philosopher, wrote about the invention of the pestle and mortar and its evolution with the addition of animals and water power, and Huan Guan, a Han government official, speaks of the processes of iron foundry work and salt making.
Because philosophers are trained to think this way, they would be able to create tools and new innovations in technology that could completely change how technology was viewed, leading their empires to greater and greater heights.
Doc 5 states that the craftsmen who work with their hands are vulgar commoners and gentlemen do not work with hands. When analyzing a civilization, technologies and innovations can reveal the spirit of the nation. However, the reason why state involvement worked for Rome and not Han China is because of incentive.
You'd have got your treatment at a good hospital without having to shell out this lakhs of rupees and your family is relieved and happy that you are safe.
Some may see changes in technology as a vital and helpful thing, while others may oppose. He brags of Mile Markers and how this technology can be used by everybody.
Roman attitude toward technology was characterized by an affinity for large scale innovations to show off their power rather than simpler innovations, which they avoided. Had they known more and had first manus experience with tools and different trades.
What do we do here? One does not travel through Rome, one travels to it. The Han did not only invest in the technology small tools provided.
It is shown that both authorities and philosophers see a benefit of engineering in society. Although historians claim that the oldest piece of wrapping paper can be traced back to the Chinese during the 2nd BCE, the process of making paper was invented during the Han period.
Even in those instances, the employee pays the entire premium for the coverage, which supplements and stands separately from any other coverage that the employee has. Without the treatment they will be left to fend for themselves without a job and for the treatment you need a few lakhs of rupees which you don't have either.
Simple tools that benefitted the individual were widely used, but not looked upon as special technology. The evidence glorifies the technology usage during that period. Because of this, innovation was simple and intended to benefit the lives of the working class. Both Han China and the Romans did show a similarity in how their technology, even though it was viewed differently, helped to develop their Empires.
Why purchase health insurance? More importantly, it paved the way for the creation of new agricultural tools which in turn helped increase the agricultural tax revenue of the empire. Despite the differences that can be found through their technology, their similarities in state involvement can be found there as well.
When the Roman government undertook a project, laborers were paid and therefore had incentive to do well.
A reason this may be is that it is government-sponsored and the government is trying to make itself look good. The high officials involve in most the documents, reflecting that whether the technology using is good or not. In fact, many government officials often implemented new ideas in their societies.
Plutarch was very excited about the roads in document six, and he had very good reason to be. Their science of weaving also paved the way for the creation of the Silk Road.
Pestle and mortar, iron tools, and salt to season crops were technologies the Han valued, because they were used for the most popular occupations in the empire:Han and Roman attitudes towards technology in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards two main categories, positive and negative.
The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of its obvious benefits to the author’s cities. Attitudes Towards Technology: Han China and Roman Empire Essay Han and Roman attitudes towards technology in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards two main categories, positive and negative.
The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of. Han and Roman Perspective of Technology The Han and Roman people were two different societies during the classical period. The documents highlighted Han and Roman attitudes towards technology. The Han documents displayed excerpts from it’s people that explain how the Han people relied on technology daily and respected the inventors of the technology.
Han and Roman attitudes towards technology in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards two main categories, positive and negative. The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of its obvious benefits to the author’s cities. Both Han and Rome had positive attitudes towards technology.
This was the “least acceptable” thesis. Acceptable Throughout China there was a majority appreciation of technological advancement with a few against it, while in the Roman empire, the view was split between support and pessimism.
While not especially strong, this thesis meets all the criteria specified on the left. • The Han dynasty emphasized. The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of Its obvious benefits to the author's cities. Documents 1 and 8 show government officials in charge of water technology.Download